The CBC has issued a memo to its reporters and editors reminding them not to label the September 11, 2001, attacks as “terrorist attacks.” This guidance, part of the broadcaster’s longstanding language policy, emphasizes the importance of using such terms with attribution to credible sources. The memo has drawn criticism from Conservative MP Rachel Thomas, who argues that failing to call the attacks acts of terrorism dishonors the victims and their families. CBC spokesperson Kerry Kelly clarified that the memo does not suggest the attacks should be dismissed as non-terroristic but reflects a broader practice of cautious language use regarding loaded terms like “terrorism.” This policy aims to maintain impartiality in reporting on sensitive topics, as outlined by CBC’s editor-in-chief.
Why It Matters
The September 11 attacks resulted in the deaths of approximately 3,000 people and significantly impacted global geopolitics, leading to the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security in the U.S. and a prolonged military engagement in Afghanistan. The attacks were orchestrated by the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda and have been pivotal in shaping modern discussions around terrorism and national security. Language and terminology used in media coverage can influence public perception and understanding of such events, making the CBC’s language policy particularly relevant in the context of ongoing global conflicts and the media’s role in framing these issues.
Want More Context? 🔎
