The first five minutes of the Netflix series “3 Body Problem” were difficult to watch. Despite the brutal beating of a physics professor during the Cultural Revolution in 1967, I forced myself to witness the gruesome scene until his tragic demise. His daughter, also a physicist, witnessed his public execution and lost faith in humanity.
The series, based on China’s renowned science fiction works, has faced criticism in China for various reasons, including the portrayal of non-Chinese characters and the adaptation of the storyline. Despite being a global success, “The Three-Body Problem” has not been well received in its home country.
The Netflix adaptation, set mainly in Britain with a racially diverse cast, has sparked controversy in China. Some view it as pandering to Western audiences and demonizing China, while others question the accuracy and portrayal of historical events like the Cultural Revolution.
Despite its global acclaim, the series has faced backlash in China, reflecting deep-rooted societal perspectives shaped by censorship and indoctrination. The diverse casting and portrayal of China have been sources of contention, highlighting the complex relationship between entertainment, politics, and history.
While “The Three-Body Problem” has garnered a cult following in China, the Netflix adaptation’s departure from traditional Chinese elements has sparked debate and criticism. The series’ portrayal of China as a scientific powerhouse and its exploration of universal themes have not resonated positively with all viewers.
As discussions around the series intensify, the sensitive depiction of historical events like the Cultural Revolution has raised concerns about censorship and historical amnesia in China. The adaptation’s portrayal of political violence and societal upheaval has reignited debates about the dark chapters of China’s past and their impact on contemporary society.
Despite the controversy, the series has sparked important discussions about China’s cultural identity, global representation, and the complexities of historical memory. Whether it will bridge cultural divides or deepen existing tensions remains to be seen.
