What You Need to Know
• A federal appeals court ruled that the Trump White House cannot unilaterally build a new ballroom.
• The court found that the $400 million project requires congressional approval to proceed.
• Judges Patricia Millett and Bradley Garcia stated that the President has no constitutional authority over the White House property.
On Friday, October 20, 2023, a federal appeals court determined that former President Donald Trump and his administration do not have the authority to independently construct a new 90,000-square-foot ballroom at the White House, where the East Wing previously stood. The court’s 2-1 decision emphasized that the $400 million project necessitates congressional approval, as Congress retains full constitutional control over federal property and its funding. The judges noted an absence of any authorization allowing the President to undertake such a significant construction project. They highlighted the historical precedent that no President has ever used privately collected funds to demolish substantial parts of the White House without congressional consent. The ruling allows the government a 14-day window to appeal the decision.
Why It Matters
This ruling is significant as it reinforces the constitutional principle that Congress holds authority over federal property, including the White House. The decision underscores the limitations of presidential power regarding property management and development. Historically, the White House has been maintained for the use of all Presidents and the American public, and this ruling prevents unilateral actions that could alter its structure. The case may set a precedent for future presidential projects involving federal property and funding.
Read the Full Story →
