During Supreme Court arguments, justices expressed skepticism regarding President Trump’s attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook amidst concerns about the Fed’s independence and the implications of such a presidential act. The administration cited unproven mortgage fraud allegations against Cook as justification, which she denied, claiming they were a pretext due to monetary policy disagreements. The case could set a precedent for presidential power over Fed officials, with a ruling expected by June. Chief Justice Roberts and other justices questioned the validity of the administration’s arguments and the handling of the case.
Loading PerspectiveSplit analysis...




