What You Need to Know
• The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Kalshi’s challenge to Nevada’s regulation of sports betting.
• Kalshi argued that the 1936 Commodity Exchange Act preempted Nevada gambling laws, but the court disagreed.
• The Nevada Gaming Control Board stated the ruling confirms the need for state regulation of sports betting.
On Friday, October 27, 2023, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Kalshi’s efforts to prevent the state of Nevada from regulating sports betting on its platform. The court determined that Kalshi did not demonstrate that the 1936 Commodity Exchange Act, which governs commodity futures trading, supersedes Nevada’s gambling laws. The judges noted that the contracts offered by Kalshi are classified as sports bets rather than federally regulated “swaps.” Kalshi spokesperson Dani Lever expressed the company’s intention to seek further review, asserting that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations do not prohibit sports contracts. The Nevada Gaming Control Board welcomed the ruling, emphasizing the importance of state oversight in sports betting.
Why It Matters
This ruling is significant in the ongoing legal conflict between state and federal authorities regarding the regulation of prediction markets, which include sports betting. Approximately 20 states are currently engaged in litigation over this issue, indicating a broader struggle for regulatory authority. The decision contrasts with a previous ruling from the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which granted exclusive control over sports-related contracts to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. As the legal landscape evolves, this case could influence future regulations and the operational framework for prediction markets across the United States.
Read the Full Story →
