What You Need to Know
• The U.S. Department of Justice is ending its practice of using outside experts for grant application reviews.
• The Office of Justice Programs has relied on peer reviews for decades to ensure fair grant selections.
• The Justice Department distributes billions in federal grants annually, with some awarded competitively to various organizations.
The U.S. Department of Justice is discontinuing its long-standing practice of hiring external experts to review and rank competitive grant applications submitted by law enforcement agencies, victim services organizations, and research institutions. This decision impacts the Office of Justice Programs, which has utilized a peer review system for decades to select grant recipients from a competitive pool. The Justice Department allocates billions of dollars in federal grants each year, with a portion awarded based on competitive applications aimed at supporting law enforcement projects and victim assistance programs. Critics of this change express concerns that it may compromise the integrity of the selection process and the effective use of funds.
Why It Matters
This change by the U.S. Department of Justice is significant as it affects the fairness and transparency of the grant selection process. Historically, the peer review system has been a critical mechanism for ensuring that competitive grants are awarded based on merit and feasibility. The elimination of this system raises concerns among stakeholders about the potential for bias and inefficiency in funding decisions. The Justice Department’s grant programs play a vital role in supporting initiatives that address issues such as sexual assault, human trafficking, and domestic violence, making the integrity of the funding process crucial for public safety and victim support.
Read the Full Story →
