The central question in US v. Google revolves around whether Google acquired its competitors in the online advertising business with the intention of “parking” them in a remote corner of the company to maintain its dominance. This key issue was repeatedly raised during the trial’s second week, as the government presents its antitrust case against Google. The trial aims to determine whether Google’s actions have violated antitrust laws and harmed competition in the online advertising industry.
Full Article
DOGE staffer Marko Elez resigns after reporters uncover racist posts
Marko Elez, a 25-year-old DOGE staffer involved in Elon Musk's federal government takeover, resigned after a social media account linked to him was found promoting racism and eugenics, sparking controversy. The account, @nullllptr, posted derogatory comments about Indian H1Bs and advocated for repealing the Civil Rights Act and implementing a eugenic immigration policy. Elez's resignation adds to a pattern of Trump administration staffers facing repercussions for racist comments or ties to white nationalists, highlighting the...
Read more