When the Supreme Court invalidated President Trump’s tariffs in February 2026, the president publicly criticized two justices he appointed, labeling them as “fools” and “lapdogs.” Following such rulings, judges often receive violent threats from Trump’s supporters. In a recent interview, Judge John Coughenour, a federal district court judge in Washington state, recounted receiving threats after he ruled against Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship, stating he received numerous death threats. This escalation in hostility towards judges has resulted in a significant increase in threats; last year, 400 federal judges faced serious threats, a 78% rise over four years. Judges have reported feeling under siege, with many reluctant to speak publicly about their experiences due to safety concerns, as illustrated by Judge Coughenour’s alarming encounters with law enforcement prompted by hoaxes targeting him and his family.
Why It Matters
The increasing number of threats against judges reflects a troubling trend of political rhetoric influencing public perceptions of the judiciary. Historically, the judiciary has maintained a level of independence, but recent years have seen a marked rise in hostility, particularly from political figures. Data indicates that approximately 400 federal judges were targeted with serious threats last year, highlighting a concerning environment for judicial safety. The implications of such threats extend beyond individual judges; they may undermine the overall integrity of the judicial system and its ability to operate free from external pressures or fear of retaliation.
Want More Context? 🔎
