Sean “Diddy” Combs’ conviction for transporting individuals for prostitution is supported by sufficient evidence, according to federal prosecutors, who opposed his request for acquittal or a new trial. Combs’ defense argued that the Mann Act was misapplied and claimed his actions, involving hiring male escorts for voyeuristic purposes, did not constitute prostitution, but prosecutors asserted that the law does not differentiate between voyeurism and profit.
Want More Context? 🔎






