Outrage over a strike by the Israeli military that killed seven aid workers in Gaza has intensified resistance among congressional Democrats to providing arms and additional military funding to Israel.
This growing concern has injected uncertainty into a pending foreign aid package for Ukraine and Israel that has been stuck in the House for months. It has also led to calls from Democrats to halt the shipment of offensive weapons to Israel and to link any new aid to certain conditions.
The $14.1 billion requested by President Biden for Israel’s conflict with Hamas was previously seen as a popular bipartisan addition to a larger spending package that includes $60 billion in military aid for Ukraine. However, recent events, particularly the killing of aid workers, have shifted this dynamic.
A group of 40 House Democrats, led by Representative Nancy Pelosi, penned a letter to Mr. Biden and Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken expressing dissatisfaction with the handling of Israel and urging a pause in arms transfers until an investigation is completed.
In response to the incident, the group urged reconsideration of the decision to transfer new arms to Israel and demanded a full investigation into the airstrike.
Representatives Mark Pocan, Jim McGovern, and Jan Schakowsky spearheaded this rebuke of President Biden’s approach to Israel, marking a significant shift in congressional opinion.
There is widespread bipartisan support for aiding Israel, but mounting frustration could further delay the security spending package, which is currently stalled in the House.
A growing number of Democratic lawmakers, particularly from the progressive wing, are urging the president to leverage American weapons sales to pressure Israel to protect civilians and aid Palestinians.
Senator Peter Welch of Vermont called for restrictions on offensive weapons transfers to Israel, echoing the sentiments of many progressive lawmakers.
Representative Rashida Tlaib and Representative Cori Bush have been vocal in their opposition to the administration’s policy in Israel and Gaza, urging an end to military support.
Senator Chris Coons expressed willingness to place conditions on aid to Israel if civilian casualties were not addressed.
Lawmakers have faced discontent among their constituents regarding U.S. policy toward Israel and the ongoing conflict.
President Biden threatened to condition future support for Israel on its handling of civilian casualties and humanitarian concerns during a call with Prime Minister Netanyahu.
Israeli officials announced the opening of additional aid routes to northern Gaza, while Mr. Netanyahu urged quick approval of emergency military aid during a visit by House Republicans.
The debate continues as lawmakers navigate the complexities of the situation and public opinion surrounding U.S. assistance to Israel.
The ongoing conflict in the region poses challenges for policymakers as they seek to balance support for Israel with concerns about civilian casualties and humanitarian aid.
Loading PerspectiveSplit analysis...
