Friday, May 9, 2025
News Wave
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
  • USA
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
News Wave
  • Home
  • World
  • USA
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
No Result
View All Result
News Wave
No Result
View All Result
Home World USA

Opinion: A carve out could wreck California coastal protections

26 February 2024
in USA
0 0
Opinion: A carve out could wreck California coastal protections
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


If the coast of California is a state asset worth trillions of dollars — and it is — why is the state agency that has successfully protected that asset for 50 years under assault? The answer — “unnecessary permitting delays” — is unfounded. Yet California’s exceptional history of coastal protection is in greater jeopardy today in the halls of our state Capitol than it has been for generations.

Like water flowing downhill, California’s incomparable coast has always been a magnet for development. In 1972, with this in mind, the voters of California overwhelmingly approved Proposition 20, a ballot initiative that set in motion the 1976 California Coastal Act. Unlike South Florida, the Jersey Shore or other coastal regions devoured by privatization, the California coast was by law given special protection: The coastal zone would be developed not as an enclave for the wealthy but for everyone’s use, with provisions for protecting its natural resources and its breathtaking beauty.

The California Coastal Commission was created to enforce the act with a specific charge to balance the needs of the ecosystem with the need for public access and economic development, including affordable housing. It works like this: Local jurisdictions come up with coastal plans that the commission must approve. Once a plan is in place, development permits are handled by the city, town or county, although those decisions can be appealed to and by the commission.

Over the years, the Coastal Commission has successfully defended public access to the beach in Malibu, Half Moon Bay, Carlsbad and other towns. It has helped preserve state parks, open space along the coast and the beach itself — denying permits for oil drilling, more than one luxury resort, an LNG port (in Oxnard) and a toll road (at San Onofre Beach). In 2019, it fined a developer nearly $15.6 million for replacing, without a permit, two low-cost hotels along Ocean Avenue in Santa Monica with a boutique hotel.

Predictably, this process has often been in the bull’s-eye of Coastal Act critics, and while the rationale may vary with the moment, their goal remains the same: To weaken oversight by the commission and return land-use control entirely to local governments.

Today, low affordable housing supply along the coast is the basis for attack. In legislation introduced in January, with a purpose of “resolving unnecessary permitting delays in the disproportionately low-housing Coastal Zone,” state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) has proposed an unprecedented carve out of 23.5% of the coastal zone in San Francisco. Specifically, Senate Bill 951 would delete from commission oversight residential areas on the city’s western edge, as well as a piece of Golden Gate Park. As the first significant coastal zone reduction in more than 40 years, this attack on the commission could set a dangerous precedent that would invite similar carve outs from San Diego to Santa Monica to Crescent City.

Last month, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors voted overwhelmingly to oppose SB 951, and, one day later, the Coastal Commission, by unanimous vote, did the same.

The existential threat that this legislation poses to the Coastal Act and the entire California coast is undeniable. Among numerous commission responsibilities affected, SB 951 ignores the agency’s essential role in planning for sea-level rise adaptation along San Francisco’s increasingly vulnerable coast. And it seems no mere coincidence that the excluded area includes land proposed for a controversial 50-story condominium and commercial project in the flats of the Outer Sunset neighborhood north of the San Francisco Zoo.

The claim that the Coastal Commission is responsible for housing inequity in the coastal zone, though long on rhetoric, is belied by the historical record. Indeed, when the Coastal Act became law in 1976, it required that “housing for persons of low and moderate income shall be protected, encouraged, and, where feasible, provided.” The commission actively complied, approving or protecting from demolition more than 7,100 affordable units between 1977 and 1981 and collecting an estimated $2 million in “in lieu” fees to support affordable housing.

But in 1981, the state Legislature amended the Coastal Act to remove the commission’s affordable housing authority. Contrary to the claim of “unnecessary permitting delays” on which SB 951 is based — only two coastal development permits in San Francisco have been appealed to the commission in 38 years — it is this amendment, and the fact that developers prefer to build high-end projects, that has produced today’s affordable housing deficit in the coastal zone. As then-Coastal Commission Chair Leonard Grote warned in 1981, “The passage of this bill would make sure that the ability to live near the coast is reserved for the wealthy.” And so it has.

If increasing the supply of affordable housing near California’s coast is actually the goal of SB 951, then restoring, not reducing, the commission’s authority is needed. It was a mistake in 1981 to remove the commission’s power to require that projects it approved included affordable housing, and it’s a mistake in 2024 to expect that diminishing the coastal zone will right that wrong.

The California Coastal Commission has an extraordinary record of success in protecting California’s most valuable environmental and economic resource, and its regulatory role is as essential today as it has ever been. SB 951 would weaken, not promote, equal access to that resource, and it threatens to erode, perhaps irrevocably, the most successful coastal management program in the country.

Joel Reynolds is western director and senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council in Santa Monica. Tom Soto is a former alternate member of the California Coastal Commission and a Natural Resources Defense Council board member.



Source link

Tags: CaliforniacarveCoastalOpinionprotectionswreck
Previous Post

Denmark closes investigation into Nord Stream explosions – POLITICO

Next Post

The End of The ‘White-Haired Rajah,’ a Borneo Robber Baron

Related Posts

Catholic Americans rejoice for Pope Leo XIV
USA

Catholic Americans rejoice for Pope Leo XIV

by My News Wave
9 May 2025
0

Confusion initially enveloped St. Peter's Square as Cardinal Dominique Mamberti announced the election of Pope Leo XIV, with cheers erupting at "habemus papam" but the name itself lost in the noise. American pride surged among some, like Alec Maddox and his brothers, despite their limited knowledge of the new pontiff, who is viewed as a moderate favoring a pastoral approach. Opinions varied, with some expressing disappointment over the U.S. influence in the decision, while others...

Read more
Forget tariffs — this U.S. shoe company vows not to hike its prices
USA

Forget tariffs — this U.S. shoe company vows not to hike its prices

by My News Wave
9 May 2025
0

Steep U.S. Tariffs Impacting BusinessesAmid steep new U.S. tariffs, footwear company Keen plans to keep prices steady while many others are forced to hike prices to absorb costs. Keen has diversified its supply chain beyond China to mitigate risks associated with tariffs, operating in multiple countries including the U.S., Dominican Republic, and Thailand. Experts warn that the footwear and apparel industries, heavily reliant on China, could see prices rise significantly, with average annual household spending...

Read more
‘I flipped out, I said no way!’
USA

‘I flipped out, I said no way!’

by My News Wave
9 May 2025
0

The church where Pope Leo XIV, formerly Cardinal Robert Prevost, attended mass as a child is now in disrepair, reflecting the declining influence of the Catholic Church in urban America. Despite the church's state, local Catholics express excitement over having an American pope from Chicago, hoping his leadership will rejuvenate the faith amid declining attendance and ongoing scandals. As preparations for a special mass unfold, the community remembers Leo XIV’s humble beginnings and anticipates his...

Read more
Woman killed by alligator during couple canoe trip, husband tried to save her
USA

Woman killed by alligator during couple canoe trip, husband tried to save her

by My News Wave
9 May 2025
0

A Florida woman, 61-year-old Cynthia Diekema, was killed by an alligator while canoeing with her husband near Lake Kissimmee in Polk County. The couple's canoe tipped over after hitting the alligator, and despite her husband's efforts to save her, Diekema was bitten and her body was later recovered. Wildlife officials are investigating the incident, noting that deadly alligator attacks are rare, and they advise the public to stay away from water edges to reduce risks....

Read more
Almost 60 cases dismissed due to corruption in a northern Alabama police department, grand jury finds
USA

Almost 60 cases dismissed due to corruption in a northern Alabama police department, grand jury finds

by My News Wave
8 May 2025
0

A grand jury in Hanceville, Alabama, has ordered the dismissal of nearly 60 felony cases due to a "rampant culture of corruption" within the local police department, which led to the indictment of four officers and the police chief for evidence mishandling. The audit revealed serious documentation failures, with significant amounts of evidence missing, prompting Cullman County District Attorney Champ Crocker to state that even one compromised case is unacceptable. Following polarized community debates, Hanceville's...

Read more
Iranian student in Alabama to self-deport despite withdrawal of initial charge
USA

Iranian student in Alabama to self-deport despite withdrawal of initial charge

by My News Wave
8 May 2025
0

An Iranian mechanical engineering student, Alireza Doroudi, chose to self-deport after being detained for six weeks in a Louisiana facility, despite the U.S. government dropping a charge related to his arrest. Initially detained under national security concerns, his visa was revoked without explanation, and he was unable to secure bond, leading to his decision to leave rather than face indefinite detention. His attorney criticized the process as a denial of due process, while Doroudi's fiancée...

Read more
News Wave

News Summarized. Time Saved. Bite-sized news briefs for busy people. No fluff, just facts.

CATEGORIES

  • Africa
  • Asia Pacific
  • Australia
  • Business
  • Canada
  • Entertainment
  • Europe
  • India
  • Middle East
  • New Zealand
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • UK
  • USA
  • World

LATEST NEWS STORIES

  • Flu, COVID-19 vaccines now mandatory for Singapore Haj pilgrims
  • Iraq PM reaffirms PKK designation as ‘banned group’  – Middle East Monitor
  • Catholic Americans rejoice for Pope Leo XIV
  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 News Wave
News Wave is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
  • USA
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Technology

Copyright © 2025 News Wave
News Wave is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In