ATLANTA (AP) — The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump and others rejected arguments by the former president on Thursday. Trump contended that the indictment seeks to criminalize political speech protected by the First Amendment.
The indictment, issued in August by a Fulton County grand jury, accused Trump and 18 others of participating in a scheme to illegally try to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia after the Republican incumbent narrowly lost the state to Democrat Joe Biden. Trump’s attorneys argued that all charges against him involved political speech that is protected, even if the speech turns out to be false.
However, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee wrote that at this pretrial stage, he must consider the language of the indictment in a light favorable to the prosecution. The charges do not suggest that Trump and the others are being prosecuted solely for making false statements, but rather that they acted willfully and knowingly to harm the government, he wrote.
“Even core political speech addressing matters of public concern is not impenetrable from prosecution if allegedly used to further criminal activity,” the judge wrote.
He also noted that even lawful acts involving speech protected by the First Amendment can be used to support a charge under Georgia’s anti-racketeering law, which prosecutors used in this case.
McAfee did leave open the possibility that Trump and others could raise similar arguments “at the appropriate time after the establishment of a factual record.”
Steve Sadow, Trump’s lead attorney in Georgia, said in an email that Trump and the other defendants “respectfully disagree with Judge McAfee’s order and will continue to evaluate their options regarding the First Amendment challenges.” He found it significant that McAfee indicated they could raise their challenges again later.
A spokesperson for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis declined to comment.
McAfee’s order echoes an earlier ruling in the federal election interference case against Trump brought by Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan wrote in December that “it is well established that the First Amendment does not protect speech that is used as an instrument of a crime.”
No trial date has been set for the sprawling Georgia case, one of four criminal cases pending against Trump as he seeks to return to the White House, though Willis has asked for the trial to begin in August. Four people have pleaded guilty after reaching deals with prosecutors. Trump and the others who remain have pleaded not guilty.
Loading PerspectiveSplit analysis...
