When Greenpeace lost a $670 million verdict over its role in oil pipeline protests, a quarter-billion of the damages were awarded for defaming the pipeline’s owner, sparking concerns among activists and First Amendment experts. The lawsuit, filed by Energy Transfer in 2019, accused Greenpeace of orchestrating unlawful protests to block the Dakota Access Pipeline, with defamation claims playing a key role. The verdict raises questions about the boundaries between peaceful protest and unlawful activity, with implications for free speech and public debate.
Full Article
Down 24%, Should You Buy the Dip on BigBear.ai?
BigBear.ai (NYSE: BBAI), an AI data analytics firm, has experienced significant share price volatility, soaring 142% over the past year compared to an 11% return for the S&P 500, though it has recently faced a 24% decline in the last three months. This downturn has raised questions for investors about whether it is a good time to buy or a signal to avoid the stock. Despite its past gains, the company still has much to...
Read more