Tomorrow, April 11, US President Joe Biden will host a tripartite summit in the White House with Fumio Kishida of Japan and Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. of the Philippines as guests. Announced at a time of escalating tensions in the South China Sea, the optics of the summit are as much about decline as they are about resurgence.
On Biden’s part, the summit represents a potential handing-off of stewardship of the anti-China regional alliance to Japan, even as the summit is a means to stuff the gift stockings, so to speak, of allies such as Japan and the Philippines, as uncertainty mounts over the durability of American commitments abroad, particularly if Biden isn’t reelected.
For Marcos, the summit marks the point when his administration stops being a mere restoration and more properly his own era. The past may have been assiduously cultivated to help (re)claim power, but he is left to his own devices as to how to keep it, in a world far different from that of his father. When he returns to the White House, he will be doing so armed with all the attributes of a leader who matters. He has systematically deprived the rambunctious half of his ruling coalition –the father-and-daughter Dutertes, the Arroyos, and others—of their access to public funds and their own bully pulpit. He has put together a team that in turn enables him to travel the world and gain the Philippines renewed relevance to the coalition to contain China, a role more in keeping with Filipino pride – and prejudice.
Marcos is not caught between China and America, for reasons we shall see. Rather, he is caught between the East and South Asian and Western alliance containing China, and a more ambivalent if not patently defeatist ASEAN. Nor is he caught between his coalition and those of his – and his father’s – opponents over the past half century. The first president in over a generation to obtain a majority mandate, he is caught between the major factions of an electoral coalition which has begun to come apart. First to go, jettisoned, really, was former house speaker (and president) Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. Next to go was his predecessor, Rodrigo R. Duterte. He remains allied with Sarah Duterte, his vice-president, who seems tamed, for now: she has learned to say “no comment,” when asked about the South China Sea.
Still, Marcos is a princeling, and his princeling status means three dynamics are always at work: the first is that of the local, specifically in what his elder sister Imee breezily refers to (in private) as the “Grand Duchy,” their political bailiwick and home province, Ilocos Norte. This includes a glimpse into sibling rivalry. The second is domestic politics and the role public opinion plays as a kind of continuing plebiscite on incumbents, as well as the ongoing dynastic competition for the succession to the Philippine presidency. The third is foreign affairs, in which the Philippines identifies itself as part of the western alliance, and the traditional security role of the Philippines as part of the “first island chain,” principles which, in a nation of severely eroded institutions, its two least dysfunctional ones, the diplomatic and the military, are committed.
Princeling in the Middle
In every administration, there is always factional competition for influence. This is particularly intense in the formative period of the campaign. At a time of coalition formation, the time-honored Philippine political dictum that “politics is addition” applies, and for the enterprising, this is the time to put words in the candidates’ mouth, betting on the candidates’ inattention or unwillingness to be divisive, at such a crucial time.
With every sign that a Marcos Restoration was, at last, in the cards, this family division played out in public in a subtle but meaningful way: foreign policy. There is more to this than the Marcoses trying to play both sides. There seems a fundamental disagreement between the siblings as to the strategic direction that best serves the country (and themselves). The fly in the family ointment seems to be the family of the indestructible Imelda Marcos, née Romualdez.
The last time Marcos was in the White House, one of his predecessors, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, ended up irking him, sitting where she shouldn’t, and intruding herself into conversations she was merely supposed to witness. This time, Arroyo is neither a part of Marcos’s official delegation nor more than a nominal member of his coalition. Those who have proven more durable are the President’s kin: his uncle, Jose Manuel Romualdez, who is the Philippine ambassador to Washington, and his first cousin, Ferdinand Martin Romualdez, who is Speaker of the House. The former is influential in foreign policy; the latter is in the ins and outs of domestic politics.
The elder Romualdez can be said to possess the institutional memory not just of the Philippine establishment but of the Marcos family. The Chinese couldn’t have failed to notice that in Marcos’s inaugural address, he greeted the Governor-General of Australia (where one of the new president’s sons was a student at the time) by name, while China’s Vice-President was subsumed into the category of “heads of delegations.”
The Department of Foreign Affairs, under a bland career diplomat, is best understood as throwing its institutional weight behind Ambassador Romualdez. How that weight manifests itself can be gleaned from specific presidential choices. Since the time of Marcos’s father, the first overseas trip of a Philippine president after assuming office has been to an ASEAN capital. The choice of which one sends a signal about the new administration’s approach. Marcos’s choice of Indonesia, for example, marked a return to traditionally warm ties with that country, which he visited once more in 2023.
An interesting (both for what he says and if you carefully read between the lines) interview of Ambassador Romualdez early last year essentially laid out the Philippine approach.
Romualdez’s words are significant due to his crucial role, along with other Filipino diplomats and the armed forces officer corps, in countering Duterte’s efforts to align with China and Russia during his six-year tenure. They surprised many by not only working to restore traditional alliances but also to strengthen them and include new partners.
There are various aspects to consider: “Marcos aims to prove that… clearly, the family is not what people have portrayed them to be.”
There is an understanding of foreign affairs as a component of domestic politics: “He [Marcos] desires a good relationship with China but is constitutionally obligated to safeguard our territorial integrity.”
Moreover, there is a recognition of institutional necessities: “Despite domestic political upheavals, the Philippines maintained a strong alliance with the US for the past few decades, even after the closure of American bases in the early 1990s.” This includes forging coalitions: “We are in talks with the US and Japan, and even Australia is getting involved, potentially leading to a Quadrilateral agreement. This diversification is positive as we are not solely reliant on the US.”
Romualdez’s talking points are crucial not only because he is President Marcos’ maternal uncle but also due to his background in journalism and public relations. He has been a key figure in managing American ambassadors to the Philippines and was appointed Philippine ambassador to Washington due to his familiarity with the US capital. He declined the position of foreign secretary, opting to serve in Washington as he believed it would be more beneficial.
Indeed, his role has been significant, evident in the strong backlash from Chinese media against him.
Romualdez’s columns, written from Washington, serve as weekly talking points for the Philippine stance, embodying the Filipino approach to nationhood and countering Chinese diplomacy. This has put Beijing in a difficult position.
China argues that the US is unreliable and any Filipino leader relying on American support will be let down. This sentiment was expressed in a statement by the Chinese Embassy in Manila directed at Marcos’ representative in Washington. China, Japan, and Korea are likely to hold a summit, emphasizing dialogue over conflict.
Beijing’s criticism is a reminder of the Marcos family’s disillusionment with America. Despite initial pro-China leanings, President Marcos shifted his stance once in office.
Chinese efforts to influence media and public opinion have faced resistance, with many not swayed by pro-China rhetoric. The geopolitical divide is reflected in the ruling coalition, with Marcos strengthening ties with old and new allies while previous leaders like Macapagal-Arroyo and Duterte advocate for China.
Chinese analysis of China, Ilocos Norte, and the Marcoses may have been overconfident based on past experiences. The Marcos family dynamics are complex, with factions emerging once in power. Imelda and Imee Marcos found themselves marginalized by President Marcos’ wife during his campaign.
But the First Lady being Visayan, and thus inclined to have a more proprietary interest in her ancestral region, means she has found it useful –even necessary—to form a faction with the other Romualdezes.
The rift in the ruling coalition has accelerated because of the activities of the President’s first cousin, Speaker of the House Ferdinand Martin Romualdez whose coalition-building, in anticipation of a presidential bid, the President’s own (elder) sister, Senator Imee Marcos, has conspicuously opposed, to the extent of very publicly aligning herself with the Dutertes. Yet it’s noteworthy that she has to moderate her support for China when China makes itself unpopular with Filipinos.
Manuel L. Quezon III is a Filipino writer, former television host, and a grandson of former Philippine president Manuel L. Quezon





