The Centre argued before the Supreme Court that the ruling in the Tamil Nadu governor’s case does not fully resolve the ongoing legal dispute between Kerala and its governor. Kerala’s counsel contended that the verdict addresses the issue of time limits for presidential reference, while the Centre’s representatives maintained that certain aspects remain unresolved and necessitate further examination by the court. This disagreement highlights the complexities surrounding the legal interpretations and implications of the previous ruling.
Full Article
Uttarakhand high court stays panchayat polls over quota notification
About the AuthorPankul SharmaA journalist based in Dehradun, Uttarakhand, Pankul Sharma has over 18 years of experience and serves as the Principal Correspondent for TOI. His coverage areas include archaeology, industry, and judiciary matters, including the High Court, NGT, Consumer Commission, and various tribunals.Read More Need More Context? 🔎
Read more