The Centre argued before the Supreme Court that the ruling in the Tamil Nadu governor’s case does not fully resolve the ongoing legal dispute between Kerala and its governor. Kerala’s counsel contended that the verdict addresses the issue of time limits for presidential reference, while the Centre’s representatives maintained that certain aspects remain unresolved and necessitate further examination by the court. This disagreement highlights the complexities surrounding the legal interpretations and implications of the previous ruling.
Full Article
USFDA to 'phase out' eight approved synthetic food dyes by 2027
US President Donald Trump's administration announced plans to phase out eight approved synthetic food dyes by the end of 2026, citing health concerns linked to conditions like ADHD and diabetes. FDA commissioner Marty Makary emphasized that these dyes serve no nutritional purpose and primarily enhance product appearance to increase sales. The ban builds on previous restrictions and directs further research on additives' effects on children's development, though industry opposition may be less vigorous than in...
Read more